casa del vino

Where wine is on the table everyday

Leave a comment

Day 181 – A View from the Top of the Hill

shotfireSix months.

Not that long in terms of a lifetime.  Not that long in terms of adulthood.  Not that long in terms of waiting for NFL training camps to open!

Six months does equal a lot of TIME . . . 181 days equals 4, 344 hours . . . 181 days equals 260,640 minutes. . .181 days equals 15,638,400 seconds, BUT 181 days also equals 181 DIFFERENT bottles of wine – tasted, reviewed and shared!  AND, the best is yet to come!  Yep, we’re now on the downhill side of BJWine365 – and we’re on a roll to try, taste and blog about a different wine every night. . .we’re heading strong for August 31st and it’s going to be here before we know it!

In the past six months, we started right out of the box with a set of amazing wines from Twin Liquors‘ 75th Anniversary Sale.  That sale gave us an affordable foundation for the first 45-60 days of this blog.  By visiting and talking with Patrick from Grape Juice and Peter from The Main in Kerrville; Nathan from Gabriel’s in San Marcos; Andy from Central Market in Austin and several others, we’ve amassed a wide variety of wines, varieties, flavors and countries in our first six months.  Our challenge is still ahead and our resolve is strong . . . no duplicate wine in the next six months. . .only new wines–some from the same vineyards (hey, it helps spread the word!)–some from brand new sources and some from–well, places we’ve never been to before!  A roller coaster you ask?  You bet–but, if the next six months are as fun as the first six months, you’ll be reading about this blog for years to come!  Each day, more and more of you are kind enough to pass along our blog or a link or a Facebook post, and that helps us garner more views and attention.  We’ve been fortunate enough to hear from some of the wine makers who make the wine that we’ve written about, and our hope is to engage even more as time goes on.

Tonight, we went to the land down under . . . being BIG fans of Australian wines, we came across this one at Twin Liquor‘s Dollar Sale.  Since we’ve had good success with wines from the Barossa Valley – they tend to be big and bold – we thought that the 2010 Shotfire Shiraz would be a good way to wrap up the first six months of our blog.  Their comments, “Deep red color, with a lifted and intense nose of blackberry fruit, sweet spice and dark chocolate. The palate is very rich and flavorsome with blackberry and plum fruit.”  Our comments, Yes, the color ws superb–rich, dark red–and the nose was fruity but had a subtle hint of smokiness.  The taste was rich, full of fruit, a slightness of chocolate, but the finish – well, it just didn’t quite measure up to the rest of the wine.  No, it’s a very tasty wine, but don’t expect a “marching band” on the finish.  It’s big, but not so big that you melt into your chair as your sipping on this wine.  We have enjoyed numerous wines from Australia, and we’ve been pretty upfront about our love for the big, bold, in-your-face wines of not only the Barossa Valley but also McLaren Vale.  Since this wine was on sale for less than $15 at Twin, in spite of its’ finish, this one was a winner.  We’d buy it again, but the sale price is about the value we’d place on it. . .much more than that and it has competitors that are better.  Since it’s a 2010, it’s also younger than some of its’ 2009 cousins, so look, taste and decide!

We hope that you’ll stay with us for the next six months.  We’ve searched the blogosphere as well as the wine internet and haven’t found a wine-lover site that has reviewed 365 different wines in 365 days.  The BIG question is, how are we going to find the next six months worth of wine?  Well, we guess you’ll have to keep reading–and hopefully commenting–to see what wines we find to settle our fancy.

Until then, remember to enjoy your favorite wine responsibly and recycle whenever possible.



Day 180: Where Angels Goes, Trouble Follows . . .

lock & key meritageWe knew we were in trouble.  It started with an email that Jean received on Monday.  She forwarded it to Brian at work and to the house.  Oh, this wasn’t going to be good . . . not at all!  It intensified Monday night.  Yep, we had just turned on the television to catch the late, local news, and there was the second sound (aka our good friend Sandra) of trouble.  It got worse on Tuesday morning; when the alarm went off and the third sign that we were in trouble played on the radio.  The message was repeated on the television — not once but twice — we were doomed.  To make matters worse, it was happening over THREE days.  They already knew that they had us.  All we could do is raise a white flag, throw in the towel, walk away from the ring, hang up our cleats . . . and give in.  It was like – we could hear the theme song from the movie, “Jaws” playing in the background and getting louder and louder (“think you’re gonna need a bigger boat”)  . . . What are we talking about?Twin SaleUh yeah!  The folks at Twin Liquors really know how to sucker punch a couple of wine lovers!  Oh, no . . . it’s not good enough to just have a 75th Anniversary Sale last August . . . NOOOOO! They had to go out and create a ‘Dollar Sale’ for three days in February.  So, they mark down their product to the lowest price; add a dollar for margin and sell it.  For wine lovers, it’s the difference between three bottles and eight bottles.  For amateur wine bloggers, it’s like a gift from above!  We can “unlock” some great values in different wines, and the “key” is to save some cash!

So, tonight, we “invested” at Twin Liquor in San Marcos and found this 2009 Meritage from St.  Helena, California in the heart of Napa County.  Most places have it priced between $13 – $16 a bottle, but tonight we made off with it for less than $11.  In terms of pricing, score a big one for the bloggers.  When we opened it up, the cork was fresh, moist and the smell was fruity with hints of oak.  This wine, we learned, is from the Trinchero Family of wines . . . which means, it comes from a BIG operation!  This wine is a true Meritage blend of 60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 37% Merlot and 3% Cabernet Franc and the grapes are sourced from some of the best vineyards in Sonoma and Lake counties.

To be honest, at first we weren’t too sure about this bottle . . .  The nose was heavy with prunes or dates – not sure which ones because it was overpowering.  The color was oh so close to copper but still held a dark burgundy tone.  The taste upon initial opening wasn’t good at all.  It was more like ‘pucker time’ than wine time!  However, like most wines with a good heritage, the key to unlock the flavor of this wine was time . . . the longer the bottle stayed open, the better the wine began to taste.  Even as we type tonight’s blog and sip on the wine, it’s changing . . . the flavors are now deepening and becoming much more pronounced.  A richer, deeper flavor that seems to be much more advanced than the wine that we smelled and tasted upon opening.  Again, it was soft and supple with a pleasant combination of black cherry cola, dark spices, sandalwood and tannins making it a tremendous value at this price point.  In other words, the wine works – – even though it was slow to open, the wine is extremely enjoyable and delicious and for the price point under $11 a bottle, we could be convinced to buy a few more of these and save them for “later”.

For the record, there is a golden oldie movie classic with the same name as tonight’s blog.  Name two of the actresses who starred in the movie and have gone onto much higher levels of fame.   A bottle of tonight’s wine goes to the first one who chimes in with the correct answer . . . pretty sure there are a few Freitag’s out there who can “name that tune” . . .

Regardless of whether you lock your wine or open it with a key, please remember to enjoy your favorite wine responsibly and recycle whenever possible!

Leave a comment

Day 179: Gone In 60 Seconds . . . or less

auto moto merlotTuesday nights are ‘Chopped’ nights at Casa del Vino.  Yep, we are hooked on Food Network’s, “Chopped” series and have been regular viewers for almost four years.  If you’ve never ‘partaken’ of the show, it pits four chefs against each other and the same ingredients in a basket four three rounds . . . appetizer, entree and dessert.  After each round, one of the chefs’ gets Chopped and it’s down to three chefs – then two before the ‘Chopped Champion’ is chosen from the final two.  The things that are put in their baskets would amaze even the most seasoned chef . . . chicken feet (complete with toe nails); chicken in a can; star fruit; purple asparagus; and some of the strangest ingredients on the planet.  Most of the time, the cooks’ are restaurant trained or professional cooks.

We watch the show – not so much for the recipes, which there are NONE! It’s more for the individual styles that these culinary artists put into their creations.  Admittedly, some look really delicious and others look, well, that’s why they have judges!  The show features three judges who are accomplished professional chefs, restauranteurs and successful foodies in their own rite, and their tasting and observing helps determine the champion.  Tonight’s show (originally aired this past Sunday) featured top amateur chefs’ and it was awesome.  To have a totally different career and cook food on the side as an avocation is a true calling.

Speaking of calling, tonight’s wine was out of the ordinary for us.  A Merlot – – – something that we really don’t care for all that much and a close out at Gabriel’s . . . a 2005 Auto Moto Merlot and available for under $10 a bottle.  So, you’d think that  a 2005 Merlot would be stout, fruitful and long-lasting . . . you’d think!  It had an ‘interesting’ nose . . . not fruity, but not oaky . . . not full-bodied but not light.  It had a kerosene aroma that mixed with green pepper and black cherry. . .Weird?  Yeah, we TOTALLY get it.  The taste was less than awe-inspiring.  On the palate was a real nice, smooth black cherry taste along with hints of pipe tobacco.  BUT, the finish was GONE.  It WASN’T there.  There was NO after taste . . . no fruity elegance; no smoky goodness; no slate or limestone or tobacco . . . NOTHING.  It was gone!  As the wine opened up, we thought that the finish would open with it, but to no avail.  So, to make sure that we weren’t off of our rockers, we did a little “recon” and found out that others describe the wine as, “It’s a clear, bright light to medium colored ruby-violet wine with some structure to it. Your nose will detect some definite berry notes for this one, (raspberry/blackberry) but not especially pronounced. This follows on to your palette as well (again raspberry/blackberry) with some well modulated tannins and a very light astringency that will dry the mouth but not aggressively so. A good thing, at least for me. This leads to a pleasing finish and good balance. Best for sipping but with a light enough lunch that won’t tax it too much, you might be able to use it there too.”  HUH?  A pleasing finish and good balance?  Maybe it was because we tasted it on a Tuesday, but this wine – even at a discounted price – was not what we’d hoped it would be.

Yep, we know . . . we’ve had another string of less than stellar wines (good news though – our good friends at Twin Liquors are repeating their “Dollar Sale” this week – looks like a shopping trip is in order).  But, remember, we’re here to taste 365 different wines in 365 days, so that means some are going to be good; some are going to be bad and some are going to cause us to ride the fence.  Tonight was clearly a night for bad wine.  Okay, we understand, and we hope that you do as well.

So, when you enjoy your favorite wine, please do so responsibly and remember to recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 178: Boy, Did We Miss Something . . .

MGOM-Roulet RougeYeah, so we maybe were asleep at the wheel because we were supposed to blog about a Mardi Gras wine on Fat Tuesday, but, well, we flat out missed this opportunity.  Oh, yes, of course we blogged about a wine that night but not THE wine that was supposed to be written about . .  .seriously, how could we mess up this bad?

We had a wine from our days in Kerrville when we enjoyed attending Mardi Gras On Main . . . even though it wasn’t really on Main . . . but the Mardi Gras theme was alive and well.  The crowds were huge; the food was terrific and the wine was red or white!  The premise?  Each year a different Texas winery was “commissioned” to provide the Mardi Gras on Main wine complete with vintage and label.  We’ve got wine Texas wine that goes back to 2007, and hopefully, it will still be drinkable in 2013 or 2014.  But the wine that we intended to write about – two weeks ago – was sitting in our rack until the realization hit us tonight . . . DUH!  Bart, we missed it!!!(A nod to The Simpsons).  Well, being diligent wine lovers, we felt (feel?) obligated to at least open up the wine and taste it for blogging purposes only.  So, tonight. . .even though it’s not available for purchase . . . here are our comments on the Kerrville Mardi Gras on Main 2010 Roulet Rouge wine . . . vinted and bottled by Messina Hof Winery of Fredericksburg and Bryan, Texas.

The wine was . . . well, young.  Or maybe it was a little sweeter than we prefer.  Regardless, this wine tasted completely different tonight than what we remembered at the event.  Yes, the wine has aged in the bottle since then and yes, tastes change as well over the years, but sweet wines really aren’t our forte. And, had we really thought that the wine would be sweet as opposed to dry or even semi-dry, we’d probably have nicer things to say about it.  In reality, when you come home from work and heat up some spicy kung pao chicken, we’re thinking a big Zin-type wine with lots of pepper and not a sweet, syrupy wine like we tasted.  And, in all fairness, we caught it on the nose . . . not much, if any, oak . . . we definitely smelled fruit, but it was fruit sprinkled with sugar–which as you know makes a syrup.  It could be that we waited too long to try this wine.  We did that with some wine we bought on a trip to New Mexico.  That wine tasted really well at the vineyard, but when we opened it up, the copper color was a dead giveaway to the taste . . . AWFUL!  While this wine wasn’t copper colored, it was lighter than most big reds that we’ve tried and once we had the first taste, we knew that it wasn’t a wine that we’d finish off.

So, hopefully . . . you had a great time at your Mardi Gras party.  We understand that the Mardi Gras on Main is still going strong in Kerrville and they have a new vintage for 2013.  That’s very cool, but knowing now what we know . . . we should have partied with the wine from the event sooner; who knows, we may have even liked it.

Here’s to your Monday and a Terrific Tuesday.  Remember to enjoy  your favorite wine responsibly and recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 177: And the Award Doesn’t Go To. . .

Serendipity SyrahWe love going to the movies.  Over the past 30+ years we’ve been to literally hundreds of shows, consumed what seems to have been tons of popcorn, slurped down gallons of sodas and opened a whole bunch of candy packages.  We’ve seen some of the best that Hollywood has to offer and some of the worst.  We’ve seen Academy Award winners and losers and some that should have been.  As we sat at dinner last night, we ran through (with Daughter #1 calling out the information) all of the Best Pictures in Oscar’s history starting way back in 1929 with Wings.  One thing is certain, having the most nominations is NO guarantee of victory; in fact, as we talked through some of the movies that had multiple nominations going into the Best Picture category – very few made the clean sweep.  The other interesting thing that we learned was the number of times Steven Spielberg’s films were nominated but never won from Star Wars in 1977 until winning with Schindler’s List in 1993.  It clearly illustrates the bias in voting; when a director of the story-telling ability of Spielberg has to wait 16 years from his inaugural hit movie to his winning movie. The topic was much publicized leading up to those awards in 1993; up to that point it really was a case of, “And the Award doesn’t go to…”

As we sit and watch the Oscar’s tonight, we’ve be watching to see if ‘bias creep’ comes back; since ARGO is a film largely based on the entertainment industry’s ability to help a historical situation or will Spielberg dominate once again with his amazing bio-pic of ‘Lincoln‘?  Duh . . . of course, Hollywood ALWAYS sides with HOLLYWOOD!!!  Congrats to Director Ben Affleck (we REALLY liked ARGO), but please don’t confuse him with “Best Director”, Ang Lee . . . HUH?  Seriously?  What do those folks smoke, drink or consume?  How – how do you give a best directing for a film that had virtually NO live action?  It was almost ALL special effects?  Directing?  And Spielberg never got an Academy Award for Star Wars because it was almost ALL special effects . . . What’s up with that???

Sorry we get off of our soap box to talk about wine . .  .and the good news or the bad news depending on your viewpoint is that the 2oo5 Serendipity Syrah is LOUSY!  No, we’re being nice.  It’s rough . . . like, “how am I going to finish this glass”, rough!  We’re not sure why it’s priced (before being on sale) at almost $12 bottle.  Not much to report here . . . way too much green pepper and ‘unharvested’ fruit.  The nose was harsh and the taste was even more harsh . . . it’s like, why even bother to bottle this stuff.  Ordinarily, we could come away with something positive about a wine in this situation, but when we have to call it names and pour it down the drain – – we are dealing with a dog . . . a loser . . . and an award “recipient” that won’t be around at the end of the telecast – in other words, “a box office flop”.

There are so many EXCELLENT wines to choose from on the “menu” of local wine and liquor stores.  It’s amazing to us to see the lack of quality in locally produced and other areas-produced wines.  Even though this wine was a 2005 Syrah, it didn’t fill the bill in terms of smell, taste, finish or any other wine loving categories.  It didn’t do anything but just SIT there.

We hope that you’ll enjoy your favorite wine responsibly, and remember to recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 176: Not Much Success on the Hill . . .

rex hill pinotWhat a beautiful day in our part of the world.  Lots of bright sun and a warming breeze all combined for several hours of relaxation on the deck this afternoon.  The great news?  Daughter #1 arrived safely from East Texas complete with the “granddog” in tow.  Yep, our Miss Bridget, fresh from that ‘life altering’ surgery seemed no worse for the wear as she was reunited with our trio of “wastes of fur”!  It’s kind of funny to watch dogs reacquaint themselves with each other . . . sniffing, growling, barking and LOTS of running around.  Fortunately the deck is large enough that they can run around – be dogs – and not have to worry about chasing them all over the place!  It’s a long drive from East Texas to our part of the State, so we knew that she was going to be: A) Tired, B) Hungry, C) Talkative or D) All of the Above. . .if you answered D) All of the Above, you’d be correct!

But, it’s ALWAYS a treat to have one of both daughters home. . .it’s one of life’s moments that reminds us why we had kids in the first place and what our job as parents really is. . .to raise confident, contributing members of society that have an education, a purpose and a desire to do more.  Not sure if we’re there yet, but like any of us, it’s a work in progress.  The fact is that Daughter #1 graduates from college in roughly three months, and the reality of her situation is–she’s done it in FOUR years!  Back in the ‘dark ages’ when we went to college, graduating in four years was the norm. . .but apparently, today–it’s some kind of a badge of honor to go BACK to school for four and a half, five, six–even seven years—to earn a Bachelor’s degree!  In our eyes, the four year college student has gone the way of the pay phone.  DINOSAUR!

It’s kind of like watching our federal government–they’re supposed to spend ONLY what they take in, and that’s the way things had been done for some years in the not so distant past, but now–it’s like a badge of honor to spend WAY more than your taking in and then somehow, it’s the fault of those raising the revenue because they haven’t raised enough?  HUH?  What kind of twisted, demented economics logic is that?  Oh, wait–it’s the government and they’re here to help!  YEAH, RIGHT!

So today we stopped at Gabriel’s and grabbed a bottle of Oregon Pinot Noir. . .a 2010 Rex Hill Pinot Noir from Willamette Valley.  The price point on this wine is above our normal range. . .at roughly $25 a bottle.  We took the wine to our resident-family affecionado of good Pinot Noir wines, Jean’s Dad aka Bill’s place so that Papa and granddaughter could visit.  And, after opening the bottle and smelling the wine upon uncorking, we were less than impressed.  Hidden among the sweet cherry scent was an underwhelming musty aroma to this wine.  Additional air time didn’t seem to help it lose the mustiness.  Getting past the nose, the taste was fruity indeed, clearly, this was a sweeter Pinot than we were used to and with a meal of grilled steak, baked potatoes and sauteed vegetables, the wine just didn’t measure up.  For the money–it was a waist (sic)–kind of like some of the spending in Washington (D.C.).   As we learned about the wine, we decided that whomever wrote the tasting notes, must have been a little under the weather that day as very little, if any of what they wrote was present.  For example, they noted, “the palate is intriguing with red, blue and black fruit flavors, appealing spice and minerals, framed by delicate, ripe tannins. The wine’s structure builds gradually through the mid-palate and speaks to its intensity, balance and potential for longevity.”  For us, collectively, it just wasn’t  happening.  We’ve had Pinot Noir wines that cost a lot less that tasted and satisfied way more than this wine.  Maybe it was a bad bottle.  Maybe it wasn’t a good vintage.  Regardless, our opinion tells us to stay away from it.

At the end of the day, all any of us want to do is see our kids do well; sit back and relax after a long day, and enjoy a good bottle of wine.  Well, today, we got two out of three–which ain’t bad (as the song went). . .we hope that you enjoyed your favorite wine today and did so responsibly, and remember to recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 175: Katie – Barr The Door . . .

barr estates cab

Ahh, Friday.  The last bastion of work before relaxation!  A time to kick back and let go of the work week worries (just try saying that fast three times!) Not sure if you’ve been paying attention, but a week from today is March 1st!  Yeah, funny how it sneaks up on you . . . January – well, with 31 days, it’s already a known quantity – especially after December which also has 31 days, so February is kind of  kickback for two consecutive 31 day months — it’s like a tax refund — of days, but the only problem is that we get seriously short-changed.  Come on,  – 28 days?  It’s like the month just starts and then it’s over.  And, to make matters worse, we HAVE to go into March . . . kicking and screaming because we just got used to February and SOMEONE pulled the plug on it!

Surviving February is much easier this year . . . it’s been in the high 60’s and mid-70’s pretty much all month.  While the midwest and northeast have enjoyed a, ahem, substantial winter – our part of the world has seen above average temperatures and below average precipitation.  Lot’s of snow fell yesterday in and around our old stomping grounds in St. Louis, and the same storm is heading towards the New England area where daughter #2 is’ battening down the hatches’ (so to speak) and ready for a third consecutive weekend of winter weather.  Uhhh, yeah, we’ll just sit here and enjoy some wine ON THE DECK because we CAN, and know that at some point between February, March or April, we’ll probably get OUR just rewards . . . so much for being smug about it!

Since it’s a Friday–the last Friday in February 2013–we decided to make a trip back to Paso Robles, and more specifically, to the family vineyards we stayed at during our trip there.  The good folks at Barr Estate treated us to beautiful surroundings, the opportunity to lend a small hand to their operation and, most importantly, the pleasure of trying their wines.  Now, we’ve previously written about and raved about their Malbec, so tonight we broke open our bottle of their 2007 Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon.  This is no ordinary Cab.  It’s been aged in oak barrels for three – count ’em three–years!  The minute we opened the bottle, we could tell that this was going to be a big wine.  Crush encircled the cork and bottle rim; the aroma was permeating the kitchen . . . we had a feeling that this was going to be a tasty wine–just by the smell!  Lots of tobacco, cedar, raspberries and blackberries on the nose–a veritable cornucopia of scents that combined with the subtleties of the oak barrels.  It was a magnificent nose–leading, of course, to our first taste–and OMG! this was a big wine.  It was like a meal in a wine glass!! (Well, not really, but it sounds so impressive!)  We enjoyed this wine with a beautiful homemade pizza loaded with garlic, italian seasoning, red onions, red peppers, mushrooms, black olives, lots of cheese, sliced roma tomatoes and fresh basil.  Yeah, it was a big meal to go with a big wine and we really liked both of them.  As the evening progressed and wine opened up, it was amazing–almost like a dessert wine.  The structure, the flavors, the tannins . . . these folks hit a ‘grand slam’ with this wine and ‘Katie Barr The Door’ we’ve got to get some more!!  We loved their description, “Rich, intense, chocolaty aromas are layered with nuances of stewed black currants, tobacco and leather in this classic Cabernet.”  NO?  Really?  We NEVER would have guessed that!  Priced a little higher than our normal price range . . . at less than $30 a bottle, you’re probably going to want to get ahold of this gem – if it’s still available – because they don’t miss on their wines, and after seeing the time and effort put into the harvesting, we’re sold!

We hope your weekend is relaxing and gives you the opportunity to enjoy your favorite wine(s).  Regardless, please remember to enjoy them responsibly and recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 174 – Remember Hi Fidelity!

FidelitySo, taking a walk on memory lane, we were looking at our vinyl albums recently wondering if we’d ever play them again?  Some of our favorite artists’ albums were in the stack – – Jean has a John Denver album . . . Brian has a Moody Blues album – but without a turntable, they just sit around collecting dust.  We’ve been to a couple of Half Price Books – here in San Marcos and in Austin – and the number of albums for sale is growing.  It’s a throw back to when they were at their peak in entertainment.

Each of our families had their own version of record players as we were growing up.  In fact, the one that Brian’s parents had in their living room back in the mid-1960’s is still at our house today.  Does it work?  Don’t know – haven’t tried . . . not sure that we’d want to do that!  But, what makes it cool to at least look at is the fact that it was stereo, BUT. . .it was stereo hi-fi–otherwise known as high fidelity.  A little history from our friends at Wiki, please. . .High fidelity—or hi-fi or hifi —reproduction is a term used by home stereo listeners and home audio enthusiasts (audiophiles) to refer to high-quality reproduction of sound to distinguish it from the poorer quality sound produced by inexpensive audio equipment, or the inferior quality of sound reproduction characteristic of recordings made until the late 1940s. Ideally, high-fidelity equipment has minimal amounts of noise and distortion and an accurate frequency response.” All we know is that when we put our albums on the ‘hi-fi’, they just sounded better.

It goes on to say, “In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the development of the Westrex single-groove stereophonic record cutterhead led to the next wave of home-audio improvement, and in common parlance, stereo displaced hi-fi.  Records were now played on a stereo. In the world of the audiophile, however, high fidelity continued and continues to refer to the goal of highly accurate sound reproduction and to the technological resources available for approaching that goal. This period is most widely regarded as “The Golden Age of Hi-Fi”, when tube equipment manufacturers of the time produced many models considered endearing by modern audiophiles, and just before solid state equipment was introduced to the market, subsequently replacing tube equipment as mainstream.”  Today, well everything is digital–somewhat impersonal–and quickly outdated.  Perhaps–just perhaps–the reason that albums and turntables are making a comeback is because lost in the technology–has been the hi-fi!

It’s appropriate that we talk about hi-fi tonight, and on top of that, we revisit a wine maker that we enjoyed previously.  It’s kind of cool to try different varieties from the same wine maker and see if their touch is still working.  Tonight we sampled a 2009 Fidelity from Goldschmidt Vineyards.  Having previously enjoyed (and blogged) about their Katherine Goldschmidt Cabernet Sauvignon, tonight’s wine is a blend of 73% Merlot and 27% Cabernet Sauvignon.   We already knew what good wines were made by Goldschmidt, but were blown away by this blend.  At less than $15 a bottle, it’s an amazing value for the money.  Thanks to our friends at Twin Liquors, they’re smart to be bringing such variety and choice to their stores and Fidelity rates right up there.  The nose was rich, dark fruited and hints of spice; the taste was well-rounded, supple, fruity and smoky . . . the finish was quick but full of flavor.  In short, for a wine priced at this level, we felt like we were tasting a wine that was much older and more moderately priced.  You may want to stock up on this 2009 while you can, but the good news is that the 2010 is just as good if not better . . . the blending is a little different but the result is quality through and through.

Just like listening to hi-fi, you know quality when you hear it; tonight’s 2009 Fidelity from Goldschmidt Vineyards was quality to the taste.  As the week winds down and we’re at the front door step of another weekend, we hope that you’ll continue to enjoy your favorite wine responsibly and remember to recycle whenever possible.

Leave a comment

Day 173: Oh, So Close . . .

David Bruce Petite SirahWow!  It’s a Wednesday but feels like a Friday!   We know that it’s NOT Friday, but — holy cow — it sure FEELS like a Friday!!!  Between early morning meetings and late afternoon/evening meetings, we’ve been going in so many directions, it’s hard to keep pace!!   In our part of the world, today, the rains teased us with a few downpours that seemed to offer hope to end this long drought for our community, and it was followed by partly cloudy skies and warming temperatures this afternoon.  At the rate we are going, who knows what tomorrow will bring.

But, regardless of the weather, here we are in the 20th day of February . . . and – ok, we’re sorry, but what in the heck happened to January?  Or more importantly, who absconded with the first month of the year?  The last time we looked in, it was two or three days into the New Year!  Now, we’re 45 days into the the year and with today being Day 173 . . . we are edging ever so close to the mid-point of our journey through SO MANY wines!

Tonight we sampled a 2008 David Bruce Petite Sirah from the Central Coast of California.  A couple of thoughts before we talk about the wine itself. . .first of all, the Central Coast is FAMOUS for beautiful Sirah and Petite Sirah wines.  Secondly, this wine maker, has a history of producing exceptional wines from a variety of vineyards for remarkable products.

So, back to the wine – it is an interesting wine in that it depends on and relies upon Mother Nature to ripen fruit relatively close to the ocean while at the same time being part of the growing area in the Central Coast . . . in the simplest terms the fruit is harvested from areas. – – – “Stretching in a narrow band from Santa Barbara to the San Francisco Bay,the Central Coast region, and is characterized by the cooling influences of the Pacific Ocean.These grapes come from several vineyards in Paso Robles and southern Monterey”.  After tasting this wine and appreciating the enormity of the Petite Sirah, we found that the fruit was really forward on the palate – we’re talking blackberry and blueberry.  The nose, well, it was dominated by oak and tobacco – toasty and smoky (but not overly so).  The finish on this wine is LONG and lean . . . yep, it’s got a lot of body, a lot of taste and a lot of structure.  It’s a wine that you’d break out when your ‘wine-loving friends showed up on a Friday night’ (or on a Wednesday night after a long day)  . . .  yep, it’s a wine meant to be enjoyed by customers and FUTURE customers!

Seriously, thank goodness that we’re almost to Friday.  Before you get there, you’ll need to try this beautiful and affordable Petite Sirah . . . at less (key word: LESS) than $20 a bottle, you’ll be singing the praises of this David Bruce Petite Sirah whether by yourself or with family and friends. . .beyond that, it’s a GREAT bottle of wine!

Regardless, continue to enjoy your favorite wine responsibly, and remember to recycle whenever possible!

Leave a comment

Day 172 – The School House Rock!

schoolhouse redThere was a show called, “Schoolhouse Rock”; it started in 1973 . . . and according to our friends at Wiki, they were short, animated films that aired on Saturday mornings (duh, when mom and dad are asleep and the kids are eating handfuls of Cheerios watching television!)  In fact, “the topics covered included grammar, science, economics, history, mathematics, and civics. The series’ original run lasted from 1973 to 1985, and was later revived with both old and new episodes airing from 1993 to 1999. Additional episodes were produced as recently as 2009 for direct-to-video release.”  A couple of interesting tidbits about the program included the fact that Schoolhouse Rock was originally designed as a commercial advertising venture by David McCall, half of the Madison Avenue advertising agency McCaffrey & McCall. AND, that it was picked up by the head of children’s programming at ABC, Michael Eisner (who would later go on to become the head of Walt Disney). AND, Eisner brought longtime Warner Bros. cartoonist/director Chuck Jones to the meeting to also listen to the presentation. (Chuck Jones is widely regarded as the premier animation writer/producer/director and includes a few “recognizable” characters as part of his resume including Bugs Bunny, Foghorn Leghorn and Elmer Fudd).  So, think about this little educational gem – Schoolhouse Rock . . . and the mighty ammunition of media power behind it.  No wonder it ran originally for 12 years and has come back not once but twice.  The power of media goes beyond the senses!

Thinking back into the early and mid-1970’s, this was cutting edge stuff!  “The first season of Schoolhouse Rock, “Multiplication Rock,” debuted in 1973 and discussed all of the multiplication tables from two through twelve, with one episode devoted to powers of 10 (My Hero Zero) instead of multiples of ten. This original series was followed in short order by a new series which ran from 1973 to 1975, entitled “Grammar Rock,” which discussed nouns, verbs and adjectives along with one of the most well-known titles of the series, “Conjunction Junction.”  To coincide with the upcoming United States bicentennial, a third series, entitled “America Rock,” airing in 1975 and 1976, had episodes covering the structure of the United States government (such as “I’m Just a Bill”) along with important moments in American history (examples include “The Preamble” and “Mother Necessity”).  A fourth series entitled “Science Rock” followed in 1978 and 1979, and included a broad range of science-related topics such as Do the Circulation and The Body Machine (a play on The Body Electric), The Energy Blues, Electricity, E-Lec-Tri-City, to the most well-known of the series, Interplanet Janet (which is about the solar system).”  Probably more than you wanted to know, but we thought it was not only cool for our kids to watch as they grew up, but it STILL has value today.

So when we decided to open a nice bottle of wine, we turned to the folks at Adelaida Wines from Paso Robles for tonight’s 2008 Schoolhouse Red.  We only have two words to describe this beautiful wine that we bought through our good friends in San Antonio, Oliver-Pierre Ressel and The Grape Wine Company, OH BABY!  This is not your ordinary blend of grapes; at Adelaida, they emphasized “the heft of Syrah and the lush berry flavor of Cabernet Sauvignon, its final form is shaped by the aromatics of Pinot Noir and Cabernet Franc plus three other grapes. Through many blending trials this eclectic wine was ultimately based on quality and flavor, not expediency.”  All we know is that it was as big a blended wine as some of our Australian favorites and so smooth – easy to taste–terrific feel in the mouth, on the palate – and the finish was oh, so smooth . . . like a hot knife going through butter!  Yeah, it’s that GOOD and for around $20 a bottle you get a lot of goodness for the money.  It’s a great way to enjoy a Tuesday evening especially when the wine was paired with a spicy chicken fried rice.  It doesn’t get a whole lot better than that!

So, how many of you remember Schoolhouse Rock?  Multiplication Rock?  Bicentennial Rock?  Hmmm, we didn’t think there were going to be too many, but the content has withstood the test of time; maybe it should be required viewing on Cartoon Network or Nickelodeon or Disney?  Maybe it should be required viewing BEFORE Honey Boo Boo . . . so that we can learn what is important in this world and not what is SHORT-LIVED!

Any way, remember to enjoy your favorite wine responsibly and remember to recycle whenever possible.